Nola Hollywood

Let Me Entertain You

Beetlejuice 2: The Sequel That Won’t Be A Sequel

What is the news coming from the Beetlejuice 2 front? Well, according to a posting on, just because the name of the movie is Beetlejuice 2 does not mean its a sequel. That’s right from the mouth of Gianfrancesco Geno and director Tim Burton. Some might think Burton is trying to play coy with the idea of Beetlejuice 2 not being a sequel. The truth is, unless the film continues the storyline of the first film, then it really isn’t a sequel. If the new film simply takes the character of the “ghost with the most” and puts him into a new feature, then the film might as well be considered a total standalone project.

Was The Spy Who Loved Me (1975) a sequel to Goldfinger (1965) or was it another James Bond film? Considering if you never saw Sean Connery’s turn in Goldfinger, you would not exactly be confused about the plot of the Roger Moore outing.

A new Beetlejuice film is going to be its own entity. Just as all you need to know about James Bond is he is a spy for Her Majesty’s Secret Service, all you need to know about Beetlejuice is he is a funny, wise-cracking ghost.

There is a bit of an ulterior motive present here. The original film was made in 1988. A huge chuck of the potential audience never saw the debut of Beetlejuice. Creating a standalone film creates a fresh start. Do not be surprised to see the “2” portion of the film’s moniker dropped.


Meilani Ibrahim says:

We have talked extensively about the results and the implication of the news about films and gossips that we see, however, there is one side to it. It makes more appropriate in the sequel to movies and I think that will help in managing more success. In the actual work in making the films, another time that you will see movie news it might just be surprising to hear what you thought about.

Leave a Reply